On 05/18/2015 12:15 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On 2015-05-17 15:50, Jacco Ligthart wrote: >> HI, >> >> Today I had a good look at the open branding issues for RSEL7. >> >> I started out on the idea that all SRPMs with somehow centos in the >> name are also appropriate for us to de/rebrand. Below is the list of >> these package, sorted by "what to do with them". >> >> Could you please review if I missed any, or if you'd qualify any of >> them differently? >> Can anyone please look at the logo's, indexhtml, noindex (from >> httpd)? It would make a good first impression to have these things >> right. But I'm not the right guy to fix them :) >> >> already good debranded / not a branding issue at all: >> ==================================================== >> Tables abrt >> apache-commons-net >> perl-Module-Load-Conditional >> system-config-kdump >> >> branded, but of no use to RSEL (to remove from distro): >> ====================================================== >> anaconda >> initial-setup >> kabi-yum-plugins >> subscription-manager >> >> branded, but no fix possible: >> ============================ >> chrony >> ipa >> ntp >> system-config-date >> (all issues are with servers in a ntp config. I don't know what to >> replace it with, so just leave it as-is) >> >> branded, "simple" technical fix to be done: >> ========================================== >> basesystem >> dhcp >> firefox >> libreport >> PackageKit >> plymouth >> redhat-lsb >> redhat-rpm-config >> sos >> thunderbird >> xulrunner >> yum > > I presume you have all of the above under control. ;) > In some cases simply removing the patch from the src.rpm > that adds the upstream branding may be a good option.
Yes. Update from today: 1) I moved the non issues to the normal directories (without -branding) 2) the 'not useful' rpms are still in. awaiting any comments 3) 'ntp' branding, awaiting own vendor zone 4) 'simple, technical': all de/rebranded. where appropriate, I used http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users for bugreporting URL and www.redsleeve.org as default URL. > >> branded, in need of graphical/layout items: >> ========================================== >> centos-bookmarks >> centos-indexhtml >> httpd > > I would expect the same approach as in the RS6 patches is > applicable to those. I also think so. although the indexhtml and the httpd from CentOS feature graphics, which are not now in the EL6 RPMS. ( a nice poweredby .png for instance) > >> centos-logos > > This I will try to look into ASAP. I am _hoping_ that we can > handle this by simply copying the relevant logos used in the RS6 > packages, but if there are any that are of different size/type > they may need to be created. > Jacco _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users
