On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Dag Wieers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Bram Mertens wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Scott Robbins <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:36:48AM -0400, Gordon Dickens wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Dag, >>>> >>>> I have another CentOS 5.5 office machine which will need a current >>>> version of hplip sometime soon at which time I will try your package out >>>> and I will let you know how it goes. >>>> >>>> Thanks for your prompt reply! >>>> >>> It would be nice if you post the results, especially if you do scanning >>> with an all-in-one--as you probably noted, the article to which you >>> linked (which I wrote) :), mentioned that as of July, the hplip rpm >>> didn't work with my particular scanner--it provided a print driver, but >>> the machine wouldn't scan. >> >> Just for reference, I own an HP OfficeJet Pro 8500 all-in-one as well >> and both printing and scanning work fine on Fedora 13 with the >> following packages from the official fedora repositories: >> >> rpm -q hplip-gui.x86_64 hplip xsane.x86_64 xsane-gimp.x86_64 >> libsane-hpaio >> hplip-gui-3.10.5-1.fc13.x86_64 >> hplip-3.10.5-1.fc13.x86_64 >> xsane-0.997-10.fc13.x86_64 >> xsane-gimp-0.997-10.fc13.x86_64 >> libsane-hpaio-3.10.5-1.fc13.x86_64 >> >> Only needed to open :incoming UDP: 137, 138, 161, 427 and outgoing >> TCP: 137, 139, 427, 9100, 9220, 9500 on the firewall and then hp-setup >> correctly configured the printer and xsane was able to detect the >> scanner automatically. >> I did have to specify the printer's IP address for hp-setup to find it. > > Did you have any problems with the RPMforge supplied 3.10.6 packages from: > > http://packages.sw.be/hplip/ > > If you didn't try, that's no problem. I just wondered...
Didn't try them since the stock packages worked straight away. Regards Bram _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
