Very nice idea to measure the quality. But sorry Tamas, 50% corrupt or 90% corrupt does not make a difference for me. Especially not, when I have feeling that it is possible to maintain a 100% clean repo with the right automation tools. If Sonatype's goal is to sell these tools only for paying customers I don't have a bad feeling about that. Everyone has to make a living. But I hope sometime similar tools and a clean repo will be available for the open public. I hope OSS developers will recognize the need for quality (and a high quality repo).
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote: > Le samedi 26 septembre 2009, Tamás Cservenák a écrit : >> I think we all need some clarification, since we all talk about "quality" >> (we all agreed upon the basic things unanimously). >> What is the "quality" of a maven repository (in general)? Can we measure >> it? Can we define it? >> >> A wiki page with piled up (even personal) opinions would be good -- > don't hesitate to start one on MAVENUSER Wiki [1] > >> whatever they are -- and later we should cherry-pick the most relevant ones >> to build some tooling to build these metric. And then, we could "measure" >> the quality of different reposes (like central) and have a list of reposes >> that do meet certain "level of quality" and list publicly the others that >> does not. > > [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Home > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
