The best way is to sync your stuff to the Central Repository imho. 

Otherwise you are probably best off with using repositories in the POM or a 
checked in settings file and build.sh reference command build like mvn -s ... 

manfred

Curtis Rueden wrote on 2016-10-17 15:00:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> I have an OSS project with "mixed" dependencies—some in central, and some
> in our public Maven repo (because they are still in incubation or
> beta). Every time this discussion arises, I find myself wondering the same
> thing: how can you achieve an "out-of-the-box" build for such a project,
> without specifying <repositories>? All the alternatives I see people
> suggest (e.g., checking in settings.xml to the repository) would require
> each and every new developer to perform some one-time bootstrap before the
> project will build. This will turn away many new & inexperienced developers
> if they try to import the project into their favorite IDE and it fails to
> build.
> 
> Regards,
> Curtis
> 
> --
> Curtis Rueden
> LOCI software architect - http://loci.wisc.edu/software
> ImageJ2 lead, Fiji maintainer - http://imagej.net/User:Rueden
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Manfred Moser <manf...@simpligility.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> If you really feel you need to control the source of where you download
>> components from within the source control system
>> I would still NOT use the repositories definition in the POM since that is
>> them transferred to the target repo on deployment (unless you use flatten).
>>
>> Instead I would check in a specific settings.xml as part of the project...
>> or even multiple ones for different build scenarios..
>>
>> Manfred
>>
>> KARR, DAVID wrote on 2016-10-17 14:42:
>>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Manfred Moser [mailto:manf...@simpligility.com]
>> >> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:35 PM
>> >> To: users@maven.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: Comparing specifying repositories in pom vs. settings.xml?
>> >>
>> >> http://blog.sonatype.com/2009/02/why-putting-repositories-in-your-poms-
>> >> is-a-bad-idea/
>> >
>> > The point about open-source projects is well-taken.  I would never
>> specify
>> > repositories in a POM for a public project.
>> >
>> > The section about "Enterprise" just seems odd to me.  It seems very
>> focused on
>> > "central", when that might not be the case at all.  We use many
>> open-source
>> > projects, but those aren't very volatile.  We use dozens of internal
>> artifacts,
>> > and there isn't a lot of doubt about what repos to get particular kinds
>> of
>> > artifacts from.  I find build repeatability more important (specifying
>> all
>> > requirements in the build script).  The requirement about "generally
>> will want
>> > all your developers using the same set of repositories" is pretty
>> important to
>> > me, but the recommended solution just seems counterproductive.
>> Specifying it
>> > in the POM for the project seems to be the most direct way to ensure
>> that.
>> >
>> >> KARR, DAVID wrote on 2016-10-17 13:03:
>> >>
>> >> > One thing I run into when jumping between different projects is
>> >> > different expectations for what maven repos I need to be using.  In
>> >> > the past, I had to have multiple copies of "~/.m2/settings.xml" lying
>> >> > around, and I would hack the specified repos when I needed to.
>> >> >
>> >> > Recently, I saw a situation where the required repositories were
>> >> > simply defined in the top-level pom for the project.  If this is done
>> >> > consistently, there's no longer any need to hack the settings.xml
>> >> file.
>> >> >
>> >> > I seem to remember seeing some advice that specifying repositories in
>> >> > the POM is a bad practice.  If I'm remembering this correctly, this
>> >> > seems odd.  Forcing the correct repos to be defined in the
>> >> > settings.xml works against "repeatable builds".
>> >> >
>> >> > What is the recommended advice here?
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to