On 11/19/05, Srepfler Srgjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, Mr. Raible, > I've tried to generate hbm files from your model (appfuse) in a mockup > maven2 project, but I haven't been too successfull; Have you managed to > make a working m2 pom file for you appfuse project?
No. > Do you generate hbm files via the xdoclet plugin? No, I still use Ant for AppFuse and plan to for the next release or two. I might integrate M2 someday, but it's probably going to take quite a bit of work. I have grandious plans of someday being able to do "mvn appfuse", but that's probably quite a ways off. ;-) Matt > > Srgjan Srepfler > > Matt Raible wrote: > > >I've been using Spring 1.2.5 in my project for the past couple of > >weeks. The transitive dependencies feature of M2 has seemed to work > >great b/c there were no dependencies for Spring. > > > > <dependency> > > <artifactId>spring</artifactId> > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId> > > <version>1.2.5</version> > > </dependency> > > > >However, as of today (possibly earlier, since I just deleted my local > >repo this morning), I now have to exclude a whole bunch of > >dependencies. Below is a list of ones I had to exclude just for M2 to > >download everything and run "mvn test". To really clean this up and > >prevent a bunch of unused JARs in my project, it's likely I'd have to > >greatly expand this list to include quartz, freemarker, velocity, etc. > > > >(more comments after the xml below) > > > > <dependency> > > <artifactId>spring</artifactId> > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId> > > <version>1.2.5</version> > > <exclusions> > > <exclusion> > > <artifactId>activation</artifactId> > > <groupId>javax.activation</groupId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <artifactId>mail</artifactId> > > <groupId>javax.mail</groupId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <artifactId>toplink-api</artifactId> > > <groupId>com.oracle</groupId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <artifactId>ejb</artifactId> > > <groupId>javax.persistence</groupId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <artifactId>ejb</artifactId> > > <groupId>javax.ejb</groupId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <artifactId>jta</artifactId> > > <groupId>javax.transaction</groupId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <artifactId>connector</artifactId> > > <groupId>javax.resource</groupId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <artifactId>jaxrpc</artifactId> > > <groupId>javax.xml</groupId> > > </exclusion> > > <exclusion> > > <artifactId>jms</artifactId> > > <groupId>javax.jms</groupId> > > </exclusion> > > </exclusions> > > </dependency> > > > >Since spring.jar only depends on commons-logging, shouldn't the rest > >of these be marked optional? How did this change in the last couple > >of days - did someone upload a new POM for Spring to ibiblio? > > > >Thanks, > > > >Matt > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
