Jeremy, A good reason to use WebHDFS instead of PutHDFS is to avoid having to recompile the latter when using HDFS dialects like MapR's HDFS API as previously discussed here:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/nifi-users/201510.mbox/%3CCALJK9a4c2rxXf-7abckRSCg=iKhejhV9b_TVa2M8OhdK7mDj=q...@mail.gmail.com%3E On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Jeremy Dyer <[email protected]> wrote: > Kumiko, > > Just curious what makes you want to use WebHDFS over the existing HDFS > processors? Are you looking for a feature they don't contain or just > looking for something a little lighter without all of the configuration > files? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Apr 21, 2016, at 6:11 PM, Tom Stewart <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > What about Knox Gateway? > > > >> On Apr 21, 2016, at 3:21 PM, Kumiko Yada <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Will do. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Kumiko > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Joe Witt [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 12:45 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: Apache NiFi - WebHDFS > >> > >> Kumiko, > >> > >> Not that I am aware of. If you do end up doing so and are interested > in contributing please let us know. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Joe > >> > >>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Kumiko Yada <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Has anyone written the custom process for WebHDFS? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Kumiko > > >
