Andre - That is a very good reason to use WebHDFS that I hadn't considered. Andre I see that you have already created a JIRA for this at [1]. Thanks for starting that process. Lets get some more requirements listed there and get the ball rolling. After hearing the input from everyone in this thread I'm certainly starting to see the value.
[1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1924 On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Andre <andre-li...@fucs.org> wrote: > Jeremy, > > A good reason to use WebHDFS instead of PutHDFS is to avoid having to > recompile the latter when using HDFS dialects like MapR's HDFS API > as previously discussed here: > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/nifi-users/201510.mbox/%3CCALJK9a4c2rxXf-7abckRSCg=iKhejhV9b_TVa2M8OhdK7mDj=q...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Jeremy Dyer <jdy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Kumiko, >> >> Just curious what makes you want to use WebHDFS over the existing HDFS >> processors? Are you looking for a feature they don't contain or just >> looking for something a little lighter without all of the configuration >> files? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Apr 21, 2016, at 6:11 PM, Tom Stewart <stewartthom...@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > What about Knox Gateway? >> > >> >> On Apr 21, 2016, at 3:21 PM, Kumiko Yada <kumiko.y...@ds-iq.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Will do. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Kumiko >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Joe Witt [mailto:joe.w...@gmail.com] >> >> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 12:45 PM >> >> To: users@nifi.apache.org >> >> Subject: Re: Apache NiFi - WebHDFS >> >> >> >> Kumiko, >> >> >> >> Not that I am aware of. If you do end up doing so and are interested >> in contributing please let us know. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Joe >> >> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Kumiko Yada <kumiko.y...@ds-iq.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Has anyone written the custom process for WebHDFS? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> >> >>> Kumiko >> > >> > >
