Girard Aquino wrote:
David B Teague wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 03/18/2009 08:07 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/article5929716.ece
Yes I saw that... one can only hope that OOo doesn't disapear into
Lotus
Symphony (which works ok and has it's place I suppose in some
environments).
In the past, IBM has supported FOSS, bu that was mostly Linux, but
they might continue to support OO.o. We can only hope.
and would OOo development cease then?
It is not unreasonable to be concerned about that eventuality.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
