On Thursday 19 March 2009 04:12:35 am James Knott wrote: > David B Teague wrote: > > Girard Aquino wrote: > >> David B Teague wrote: > >>> NoOp wrote: > >>>> On 03/18/2009 08:07 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote: > >>>>> http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/article5929716.ece > >>>> > >>>> Yes I saw that... one can only hope that OOo doesn't disapear into > >>>> Lotus > >>>> Symphony (which works ok and has it's place I suppose in some > >>>> environments). > >>> > >>> In the past, IBM has supported FOSS, bu that was mostly Linux, but > >>> they might continue to support OO.o. We can only hope. > >> > >> and would OOo development cease then? > > > > It is not unreasonable to be concerned about that eventuality. > > IBM is also a big supporter of ODF and Lotus Symphony is based on > OpenOffice 1.x IIRC. What you say is true but will IBM continue this path?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
