David B Teague wrote: > Girard Aquino wrote: >> David B Teague wrote: >>> NoOp wrote: >>>> On 03/18/2009 08:07 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/article5929716.ece >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes I saw that... one can only hope that OOo doesn't disapear into >>>> Lotus >>>> Symphony (which works ok and has it's place I suppose in some >>>> environments). >>>> >>>> >>> In the past, IBM has supported FOSS, bu that was mostly Linux, but >>> they might continue to support OO.o. We can only hope. >>> >>> >> and would OOo development cease then? >> > It is not unreasonable to be concerned about that eventuality.
IBM is also a big supporter of ODF and Lotus Symphony is based on OpenOffice 1.x IIRC. -- Use OpenOffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
