Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 15:36 -0400, Richard Detwiler wrote:
James R. Liebert wrote:
I don't buy this argument for a second. Uncountable collaborations are
proceeding toward completion. All life is a collaboration. You are
suggesting that the Australian rudder for the Boeing 777 proceeded
independently to final design and manufacture while the American tail
assembly was designed and manufactured.
Pardon the language, but WTF is this about??? And how does it relate to OOo?
It doesn't, and hasn't, and shouldn't be expected too. This thread is
just playing its small part in maintaining the very low signal to noise
ratio of this list. Many people here would be happier over in the
linux-advocacy news group.
I think it was a train of thought.
First about OOo and Win7, then it went to a thought about
someone developing an opensource Windows-type of OS. Then,
so on, and so on.
I started this thread and since one of the users is using
Win7RC and stated that OOo 3.1 works great on this OS, and
not what the Win7 upgrade advisor stated.
Therefore, now we know the answer;
OOo runs well on MS's proposed new OS.
So, end of story. End of question.
End of Thread???
Tim L.
retired, and tired of the last two weeks worth of
moving into a new, and handicapped, place. Boy do
people look small from 100+ fee up in the air.
end-of-line
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
