On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:22:14 +0200
Came this utterance formulated by Dotan Cohen to my mailbox:

> 
> Bug #5556 mentions the fact that the input line for dates differs from
> the configured date format. I can understand where that would be
> useful (in fact, I would use it often) however in the current case the
> input format is the US date format, which is not known outside the US
> and is counter intuitive (the smallest units are in the middle, not on
> the left or right side). This leads to dataloss as OOo interprets the
> dates not as the user intended when entering them.
> 
> 

In my understanding OO.o takes the setting for date input format from
your computers "short date" locale setting by default (thus my input
date format is 31/12/99). This i believe is sensible as the date is best
entered in a familiar short format. Is this not the case in your
computer? (Check"Tools- Options... Language Settings- Languages"). Can
you set the Locale Setting value to a different country and report back
if this makes a difference?

And IIUC the format for calc cells can be set seperately at "Format -
Cells... Numbers - Language" (not tested here). 

In linux compare:
$ date
$ date +%c (taken from locale)
$ date +%D
$ date +%x (taken from locale)
$ date -I
It may be possible to set the locale date format strings (long or short)
for some computers to a preferred non-standard option. You could create
a custom localization and tinker with it (especially in linux - see
/usr/share/locale/). But this would be a last resort. In addition my
linux box has three locales possible for New Zealand. I am not going to
explore the difference, though i do believe it has more to do with the
character codeset in use than aything else(UTF-8, ISO-9950-1 and
default).

HTH

-- 
Michael

All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall
be well

 - Julian of Norwich 1342 - 1416

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to