Twayne wrote:
<snip>

I happen to agree with that, but I still don't use Linux in any mainstream way. Bugs and market share etc., aside, Linux is good for those who run certain programs only and consistantly and the distro includes any drivers they might need to support, or they can at least be downloaded and added to the OS. Unfortunately for most serious computer users though, unless you were brought up on Linux of any flavor, it just doesn't fit the bill.
This is bunk. Without getting into a OS flame-war kind of exchange, this is just a dumb comment and cannot pass unchallenged. I was brought up on Windows 3.1 and then '95 and encountered Red Hat 7.2, then Slackware and then Debian. Since adopting Slackware 8.1 way back when, the only time I have to use MS is when I go to work. On my GNU/Linux machine I have completed all course requirements for my MSc, have web surfed and researched, corresponded, enjoyed multimedia, programmed with Python, Lisp, C and Scheme (PLT) and played countless games of varying levels of complexity and eye-candy. This would suggest therefore, that:

(a) I was not raised on GNU/Linux (although I think that if kids want to learn about computers, they should learn either GNU/Linux or a *BSD flavour and NOT MS), and (b) all of the uses described surely count as "serious" use and is not restricted to "certain uses".

Your claims are a nonsense. Hence the challenge.
In my case it's mostly the lack of drivers for software and hardware I use, and/or software I cannot easily replace and get the same functionality I had on windows. LInux is more or less a "roll your own" OS and depends on the user being able to "roll" his own, which is technical ability most users don't have.
Again, this is a nonsense and based on some old myths or just your personal poor experiences. Almost all distros are easy to install, work right out of the box and adapt quickly and painlessly to the specifics of your hardware and machine architecture. When was the last time you tried installing Windows from scratch? I've done so several times with Vista (because it just stops operating on a laptop after a period of time for no apparent reason!) and it is Hell, takes ages and then is crippled through a lack of any decent functionality ... including drivers and additional (necessary) packages. This is primarily because the code base in MS is crappy and that coding errors for memory (mis)allocations is passed onto the third party suppliers in terms of compliance to the MS API.

Once you get into the nitty gritty of getting it to do what you need an OS to do and support, it just plain falls down on its face in my case.
That's probably because you just don't know how to use it. Perhaps it's not point-and-click enough for you, or maybe because it doesn't restrict your computing freedom to pre-designed limited options and regards the user as a competent individual user who can make up her/his own mind about their own machine?
Several software programs just don't have Linux drivers, a fair amount of hardware likewise, and the program offerings from LInux just can't meet or beat the requirements of my needs. If the pieces and portions of things do turn out to be available, it can be a real hassle to just get them installed and functioning right, too.
Again, your mileage clearly varies from that of other GNU/Linux users I interact with via such lists and fora. Perhaps if you had specific issues you could raise those with the relevant distro user community?
More specifically, I need PHotoShop and PaintShop Pro for the features each provides. There just are NOT any LInux offerings yet which can replace those required functionalities.
The GIMP pretty much parallels the functionality of Photoshop and in many instances, exceeds it. In any event, you will find most graphic designers who do this as "serious" users will use a Mac OSX, which is based on UNIX as are GNU/Linux and the *BSD variants. They won't use MS at all.
A printer, TV tuner and two PCI cards of mine simply have no Linux counterparts and thus become useless boat anchors, which is unacceptable as I earn money with those.
You'd have to be more specific than that - chances are they can be configured, but you don't provide enough info for me/ us to be able to offer help.
Linux is not something to be jumped into blindly and without substantial pre-planning to be sure it'll deliver the things you need and that are most important to you. Someday I nope it will, but it just isn't there yet.
That could be said about anything. I would also suggest that it is *you* who is not ready - the OS itself is doing just fine.
I'm at the point where I have reasonably acceptable alternatives to ALL of the MS software I used to use except fo the OS LInux.
Don't understand what you are getting at here.
So MS still have a strangtle-hold on me for their OS.
MS has a strnglehold on you. Period.
Eventually I hope to thumb my nose to MS and wave goodbye but it won't happen in the near future.
Nope, it probably won't. You still have a long way to go to shake off the FUD you've bought into.

Why did I bother saying all that? Because I'm sick and tired of the lies and overly simplistic neanderthals making comments abotu someone fixing their problems by switchign to Linux. It's dumb advice and seldom if ever called for.
That's as maybe. However, please be aware that as far as your post goes, you are guilty of spreading lies based on your simplistic appraisal of an OS you don't understand, appear not to have tried in practice (the "objections" you cite are well established MS-based FUD and have been disputed many, many times since the early 2000s), and is clearly too smart for you. For the same reasons, I'd suggest that you stay away from any of the *BSDs and be very cautious if you approach a Mac, given that it is not so dumbed down as your bog-standard MS machine.

HTH,
No, not really. But there again, I suspect that you weren't really trying to either.

Twayne

<snip>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to