On Friday 25 August 2006 11:29 pm, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> On 25 Aug 2006 at 23:52, Jack Gates wrote:
> > On Friday 25 August 2006 22:09, Dan Lewis wrote:
> > > http://validator.w3.org/ is the link I just used for a web page
> > > I created on January 2, 2006. It had the same result as I
> > > mentioned above: the only error was in the definition of styles
> > > in the Head section of the web page. BUT remember that my web
> > > pages are TEXT ONLY with hyperlinks in them. There are no
> > > graphics, tables, or frames.
> >
> > You have tables on this site www.delewis.com
>
> W3C validation errors for this site:
>
> Home page - 1 error
> Church Locations - 1 error
> index of Daily Devotions - 109 errors
> sermon index - 14 errors
> Sermons:
> * LFB/2003 - 15 errors
> * LFB/2004 - 213 errors
> * LFB/2005 - 225 errors
> * LFB/2006 - 4 errors
Congratulations! You have just listed the pages that I need to
make changes in. Furthermore,
Home Page : the error is because of the graphic
Church Locations: error because of <style> not <style
type="text/css>
index of Daily Devotions: almost all errors because of tables
Sermons: table errors in the pages mentioned
The web pages that I produce six days a week with OOo are Daily
Devotions. They are the ones to which I referred in my earlier email.
And like Church Locations, the only error when tested for validation
is in the Head section and specifically in the "style" block.
The pages with the most errors contain tables because that use to
be the way to make sure the content was placed and remained where you
wanted it to stay. There are other methods to do that now which I am
investigating.
Now can we put this thread to rest until I can have some time to
make these changes? Then we can discuss the merits of using
Writer/Web for creating web pages as it applies to my web site.
Dan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
