> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 9:37 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [users] OpenOffice ROCKS: was: Re: Openoffice suck > Once OO is loaded to shmfs on ram, all subsequent loads of OO > is almost instantaneous. I don't understand where you are
First of all, cold start is as important as start from cache, because cold start is first experience the user gets. Secondly, even for warm OO start to be fast you have to have fast CPU, because it is not just disk access what affects it. > getting this "MSO on Windows starts faster than OO in Linux" > stuff from. I tested it on my > 2.5 year old machine and OO takes about 2 seconds to load. Fast hardware compensates lack of optimization? Not everybody can afford the latest and greatest. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
