On Friday 19 January 2007 2:25 am, Pradeep Srinivas wrote:
> On Friday 19 January 2007 13:29, Marc Hug wrote (regarding Re:
> [users]
>
> [moderated]):
> > You cannot evaluate such a complex software after a few hours. If
> > MS Office is for you less "time wasting", it is probably because
> > you know it perfectly and know what is the easiest way to do what
> > you want. With OpenOffice, you could have the same impression
> > once you know it really. Marc H.
> >
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>
> <snipped>
>
> Marc, and others who have responded to J.Hartmann:
>
> J.Hartmann has probably not had the courtesy, patience, time (or a
> combination thereof) to compose a coherent, civil, thought
> provoking and (in my mind), a sensible question - he seems to have
> expressed an opinion (however incorrect that may be) and seems to
> have a preconceived notion of "good" and "bad".
>
> There seems to be little use in raising to the bait, and responding
> in kind.
>
> All I would say to him, and his ilk would be:
> "Those who are willing to give up freedom for the sake of short
> term security, deserve neither freedom nor security" (quoted,
> unashamedly, from Benjamin Franklin)
>
> J. Hartmann: should you *still* want help, it would be much better
> if you were to frame, and state, your request in a more considerate
> manner, keeping in mind that all the respondents of this list are
> volunteers.

     Actually, all of the statements made in this thread in emails 
after the OP had not likely been seen by J. Hartmann. Note the word 
[moderated] in the subject line? That means the OP is NOT a member of 
this mailing list. Without someone sending him a copy, he receives 
nothing.

Dan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to