jonathon wrote: > Fred wrote: > >> Second, why keep WP at all when OO is a much more complete suite and much >> more > usable? > > a) WordPerfect owns the legal office market;
No, it doesn't! 'Might still have the majority, but it doesn't "own" it any longer. OO IS in use in large offices. > b) The OP was asking about Quattro Pro. There are half a dozen or so > functions that are available in QP, but not OOo; > > c) There are roughly half a dozen features of WordPerfect, that are > not found in OOo. Most of those "missing" features will not be added > to OOo; In my experience, with all the 'Bloze replacements I've done with Linux, NONE who have been using WP want to go back to it, nor have any functions they need that aren't available in OO. And, over the past 12+ years, I've replaced a LOT of MickySoft! Fred --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
