On 6 Feb 2008 at 18:41, Harold Fuchs wrote: > On 06/02/2008 18:38, mike scott wrote: > > On 6 Feb 2008 at 14:39, jonathon wrote: > > > > > >> Mike wrote: > >> > >> > >>> What specific limitations had you in mind here? > >>> > >> The simple case is Wikipedia Integration using Windows Vista Starter > >> Edition. > >> or saving to DVD on Windows Vista Home Edition. > >> > >> > > > > Mmm. But the context was features of OOo that some version of vista > > stopped the user using. I can't think offhand of anything likely to > > go awol. > > > > > Errrm, sorry I'm confused. In what way are the two cited limitations not > version specific?
>From memory, there was a statement to the effect that vista would inhibit features of OOo. Checking back. it was > To take a trivial example. How would you like to explain to somebody > why they can't use a specific feature of OOo, after telling them that > OOo works on Windows Vista? From their perspective the issue is that > OOo doesn't work., not that their version of Vista is crippled. I'm wondering what feature(s) of OOo won't work on vista. The cited examples (wikipedia, dvd writing) are nothing to do with OOo. -- http://www.scottsonline.org.uk lists incoming sites blocked because of spam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Scott, Harlow, Essex, England --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
