On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:36:08 -0700
Scott Meyers wrote:
> Michael Adams wrote:
> > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:38:10 -0700
> > Scott Meyers wrote:
> >
> >>> If you are interested in any of those issues please vote for them
> >(I>> already used up my allowance a long time ago.
> >> I wanted to do this, but during the registration process, I ran
> >into> this password restriction:
> >>
> >> Up to 32 characters in length; valid characters are a-z, A-Z,
> >0-9> and non-alphanumeric characters
> >([EMAIL PROTECTED]()-_=+[]{};:'"`,.|/?~).> Spaces are not permitted, and
> >an
> >underline may not be the first> character.
> >>
> >> So I didn't register and hence can't vote.
> >>
> >
> > That is not a restrictive password scenario.
>
> I disagree. It limits the length of the password, the first character
> that may be used, and the ability to use phrases instead of single
> words. What you really mean is that you've seen more restrictive
> sites, and I have to. But that doesn't mean this one isn't
> restrictive.
>
No - what i meant was that it is *comparatively* very unrestrictive.
--
Michael
All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall
be well
- Julian of Norwich 1342 - 1416
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
