On 19 Apr 2008 at 10:30, Harold Fuchs wrote: ... > > > Exactly. Well put. Although I think I'd prefer it if it were the > > OOo/Mozilla > > > team (assuming TB gets used) that supplied the code. > > > > > > Given my opinion of the way TB currently works, I'd not be happy if > > Mozilla had a major design influence on such a project. > > > > I'm all for choice! > > > I personally am quite happy with Thunderbird but that wasn't the point I was > trying to make. My point was that whichever mail system gets chosen I'd > prefer it if the "integration" (or whatever word you'd prefer) were > implemented and distributed by an "official" OOo/<mail-client-organisation> > team so that it gets supported along with OOo etc. rather than relying on a > third party (another link, another place to break).
Fair enough view. (I am currently /extremely/ irritated by TB's lack of decent news- reader filters, which makes some groups virtually unreadable because of unfilterable spam. The mail section of TB has far better filtering - which points to inconsistent and therefore poor internal design. Purely IMO, of course.) -- Permission for this mail to be processed by any third party in connection with marketing or advertising purposes is hereby explicitly denied. http://www.scottsonline.org.uk lists incoming sites blocked because of spam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Scott, Harlow, Essex, England --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
