David Lowe wrote:
On Apr 19, 2008, at 17:59 , Drew Jensen wrote:
What is wrong with saying that if you use 'this one' there will be
some extra perks built right in.
The problem i see is that the download file size is already too
large for some folks. Why make it bigger to include a 'perk' that
many users won't want? Also, if i like the mail client i have now,
why should i have megabytes of my hard drive taken up by something i
won't use?? That goes double for the linux users, as most of them
already have TBird installed. Why should they need two copies? I
have nothing against the concept of a mail client hooked into OO, but
make it as an optional module. Recall the reason that Firefox came
into being was that Mozilla/Netscape had become too bloated. The more
things it did, the slower it became.
Why is everyone jumping to the conclusion that if work is done on
interoperability between OpenOffice.oeg and Thunderbird ( Lightning )
that this means one big application out of the two?
Where has it been said that there has to be ( will be ) one and only one
download file?
--
OpenOffice.org User Community Forum: http://user.services.openoffice.org
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
