On 1 Jul 2008 at 12:12, H.S. wrote:

> mike scott wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Easy enough to use by trial and error, but search the help file for 
> > 'changes'. Or it's probably in the manual; I've not checked.
> 
> 
> I am curious. Why does one need to search for only "changes" to get the 
> relevant help? It would be better is searching for any one of the 
> following lists that feature: revision, revisioning, changes, proof 
> reading, and other similar terms used for this.

No /need/ at all. I know the feature's there, and just did an ultra-
quick check to see what was in the help file. As the menu entry is 
'edit | changes', I just searched for 'changes', and bingo. Seemed a 
quick way to get the OP to the required place. Nothing deeper :-)
-- 
Permission for this mail to be processed by any third party in 
connection
with marketing or advertising purposes is hereby explicitly denied.
http://www.scottsonline.org.uk lists incoming sites blocked because 
of spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    Mike Scott, Harlow, Essex, England



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to