On 01/18/2014 12:05 AM, William Kwan wrote:
I tried to define a virtual interface for vlan102, by
adding ifcfg-bond0.102
manually and restarted network services.

why not via ovirt-engine?





On Friday, January 17, 2014 4:45 PM, Itamar Heim <ih...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 01/17/2014 11:38 PM, William Kwan wrote:
 > OK..  tested with bond0.102 for vlan102
 > I guess I can't do this with oVirt?  It wouldn't pickup this interface.
 > It still shows up eth0, eth1 and bond0 only

you tried to define a vlan youself on the bond, or use a vlan via a
logical network over the bond via ovirt-engine (which should work)?


 >
 > Will
 >
 >
 >
 > On Friday, January 17, 2014 1:15 PM, William Kwan <pota...@yahoo.com
<mailto:pota...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
 > Thanks all for the info. I'm trying the suggestions with 3.3.2-1.el6
 >
 > Assaf mentioned the following which is true.
 > You can make ovirtmgmt a non-VM, untagged (non-VLAN) network, then place
 > as many VM, tagged networks as you'd like on the same NIC or bond.
 >
 > I tried a few things and I haven't been able to find a way through.
 > Obviously or not, there are more facts/rules.  Just put up a few of them
 > here
 >
 > Cannot have more than one non-VLAN network on one interface
 > Cannot have a non-VLAN VM network and VLAN-tagged networks on one
 > interface. ( got this when I tried to drag a VLAN-tagged VM network on
 > the same interface as the non-VLAN VM network).
 >
 > I'll try to test adding a bond0.<vlan>.  I need to have
 > bond0 - for both mgmt network and a vlan
 > bond1 - for another subnet.
 >
 > Will
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > On Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:50 PM, Juan Pablo Lorier
 > <jplor...@gmail.com <mailto:jplor...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 > Hi William,
 >
 > You can have several logical networks on the same interface. If
 > ovirtmgmt is not a vm network you can even mix tagged and untagged
 > networks (if not, you can't mix). You don's have to do anything besides
 > creating the logical networks in ovirt and assign them to the interface,
 > ovirt takes care of creating the virtual interfaces it needs.
 > What you can't do is have more than one logical network per vlan (I
 > think there's a feature request on this, I know I've asked it on the
 >
 > list:-) ).
 > Regards,

 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Users mailing list
 > Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
 > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

 >




_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to