My colleague figured out that in order for ipmilan to work, I had to include lanplus=on in the options. Apparently, lanplus=on is the default for the ilo4 agent, and lanplus=off is the default for the ipmilan agent.
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason Brooks" <jbro...@redhat.com> > To: "users" <users@ovirt.org> > Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 3:02:13 PM > Subject: [ovirt-users] ilo4 vs. ipmilan fencing agents > > Hi all -- > > I'm trying to get fencing squared away in my cluster of hp dl-380 servers, > which come with ilo4. I was able to get a successful status check from > the command line with fence_ilo4, but not w/ the ilo4 option in ovirt. > > I see, though, that ilo4 in ovirt just maps to fence_ipmilan, and I was > not able to get a successful status check w/ fence_ipmilan from the cli. > > So, I tried resetting the mapping so that ilo4 maps to ilo4. Now I can > complete the power management test in ovirt, but I imagine there's some > reason why ovirt isn't configured this way by default. > > Will fencing actually work for me with ilo4 mapped to ilo4, rather than > to ipmilan? > > Thanks, Jason > > --- > > Jason Brooks > Red Hat Open Source and Standards > > @jasonbrooks | @redhatopen > http://community.redhat.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users