----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason Brooks" <[email protected]> > To: "users" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 1:02:13 AM > Subject: [ovirt-users] ilo4 vs. ipmilan fencing agents > > Hi all -- > > I'm trying to get fencing squared away in my cluster of hp dl-380 servers, > which come with ilo4. I was able to get a successful status check from > the command line with fence_ilo4, but not w/ the ilo4 option in ovirt. > > I see, though, that ilo4 in ovirt just maps to fence_ipmilan, and I was > not able to get a successful status check w/ fence_ipmilan from the cli. > > So, I tried resetting the mapping so that ilo4 maps to ilo4. Now I can > complete the power management test in ovirt, but I imagine there's some > reason why ovirt isn't configured this way by default. > > Will fencing actually work for me with ilo4 mapped to ilo4, rather than > to ipmilan?
ILO3 and ILO4 are mapped implicitly to ipmilan with lanplus flag ON and power_wait=4 If you change the mapping to use the native scripts its OK as long as it works for you addin Marec G to the thread Marec, should we always map ILO3 & ILO4 to the native scripts (fence_ilo3 , fence_ilo4) and not to ipmilan ??? > > Thanks, Jason > > --- > > Jason Brooks > Red Hat Open Source and Standards > > @jasonbrooks | @redhatopen > http://community.redhat.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
