Thanks Neal, your insight is very much appreciated.
A lot of people forget about SuSE, but it's got the same ethos that RH
had a few years ago, and it's worth looking into.
I can imagine Fedora being a choice in CI/CD deployments but I'd be
surprised is more old-fashioned companies would accept the risk. Going
through a whole risk vs cost thing right now.
It does seem that OpenShift is a potent platform, and pulling out of OKD
would be a horrible mess, so here's hoping that if oVirt dies that OKD
is a viable platform for both containers and Virtualisation (ah, legacy
workloads!). It's just a shame that oVirt no longer has the sponsorship,
I've been relentlessly ragged on on Reddit for admitting to using it
(mostly from Hyper-V fanbois), but it's far, far better than Hyper-V and
much less restrictive than VMWare. Hyper-V had me pulling my remaining
hair out almost every single day. Five clicks to get the MAC address of
a VM? Dynamic MAC addresses not being cluster-wide and pinned to a VM,
so they change after a migration? Yuck.
I will read that link now!
Best regards
Alex
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/KB7ABPHIO63TDWQLLPEEJD6YB7QBYQ35/
