On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Andrew Stitcher <astitc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > ... > > > > I think 'problematic' is the wrong term to use there (seems somewhat > > libelous!). > I know I'm going into bike shedding territory here (!) but do you have > another word that you think is less 'libelous'? IMO every word that > captures the problem is likely to be equally libelous! > > I prefer the "pn_sasl_excluded_mechs()" approach. It's inoffensively worded, and it gives the user the power to define the set of mechs that they find "problematic" if they don't agree with our default set.
