> On 19/01/12 10:35, Bartłomiej Kluska wrote: > > maybe the question isn't very intelligent but why not implementing the > > SyncML functionality directly into SOGo (without Funambol or > even Z-Push). > > Is Funambol server giving anything more than the SyncML functionality to > > SOGo? > This should also be considered. > > Libsynthesis (https://gitorious.org/libsynthesis) could be used to > expedite that development.
Even if SOGo would have "own" SyncML functionality, users could still take advantage of Funambol clients for Outlook or for mobile devices. It'll be compatible because it's the same standard. Regards BK > -----Original Message----- > From: Ludovic Marcotte [mailto:lmarco...@inverse.ca] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:37 PM > To: users@sogo.nu > Subject: Re: [SOGo] Why not move from Funambol to Z-Push? Many features will > be obtained. > -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
