I would also prefer using a "standalone" ActiveSync Solution like Z-Push
oder the Tine´s One.
I dont like 50 different daemons for 50 different use cases...and
funambol eats resources...dont like that :-/
On 1/25/12 3:58 PM, Martin Lehmann wrote:
But you still have the big monster Funambol-Server with all its
problems and heavy resource requirements which also must be maintained
by the admins besides SOGo, Samba4, ...
And in my opinion Funambol is to buggy and makes to many problems.
ActiveSync on top of a buggy system doesn't make it better. I'd prefer
directly use ActiveSync via Z-Push on top of the very well working
Caldav/Carddav.
I have also seen this ActiveSync implementation. Maybe it's better
than Z-Push?
http://www.tine20.org/downloads/2011-05-6/tine20-activesync_2011-05-6.tar.bz2
Am 01/25/2012 03:07 PM, schrieb Alessio Fattorini:
Nella citazione in data mer 25 gen 2012 14:53:24 CET, Ludovic
Marcotte ha scritto:
That API could also be used for other apps that want to consume data
from SOGo in JSON. Everybody loves JSON and it's the solution to all
problems!
Hi Ludovic,
We have some project in nodejs+javascript and read/write sogo data by
json could be very very useful
Other advantage about this solution?
--
[email protected]
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
