Am 25.01.2012 16:20, schrieb Martin Rabl:
Am 25.01.2012 15:58, schrieb Martin Lehmann:
I have also seen this ActiveSync implementation. Maybe it's better
than Z-Push?
http://www.tine20.org/downloads/2011-05-6/tine20-activesync_2011-05-6.tar.bz2
Had a quick look over the code - it heavyly depends on tine data
structures and classes - much effort solve this, I think.
Then, it would be better to create a sophisticated ;-) sogo plugin for
z-push which is more independent.
A general problem for ActiveSync is this one (Taken from the tine20 website)
http://www.tine20.org/wiki/index.php/Admins/Synchronisation#Patent_warning_for_US-based_users
Patent warning for US-based users
Don't use our implementation of ActiveSync if you live in the USA. As
Microsoft has a software patent on ActiveSync you can not use our code
free of charge. We are currently in contact with Microsoft to negotiate
a deal for our US-based users.
Any other users are free to use our ActiveSync implementation.
This "potential" problem will also have to be considered by a z-push
backend....
André
--
[email protected]
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
