Am 25.01.2012 18:07, schrieb mayak-cq:
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:37 +0100, André Schild wrote:
Am 25.01.2012 16:20, schrieb Martin Rabl:
Am 25.01.2012 15:58, schrieb Martin Lehmann:
I have also seen this ActiveSync implementation. Maybe it's better
than Z-Push?
http://www.tine20.org/downloads/2011-05-6/tine20-activesync_2011-05-6.tar.bz2
Had a quick look over the code - it heavyly depends on tine data
structures and classes - much effort solve this, I think.
Then, it would be better to create a sophisticated ;-) sogo plugin
for z-push which is more independent.
A general problem for ActiveSync is this one (Taken from the tine20
website)
http://www.tine20.org/wiki/index.php/Admins/Synchronisation#Patent_warning_for_US-based_users
*Patent warning for US-based users *
Don't use our implementation of ActiveSync if you live in the USA. As
Microsoft has a software patent on ActiveSync you can not use our
code free of charge. We are currently in contact with Microsoft to
negotiate a deal for our US-based users.
Any other users are free to use our ActiveSync implementation.
This "potential" problem will also have to be considered by a z-push
backend....
hi all,
i had proposed a the creation of a bounty in a previous message to
accomplish this work (and I guess we'll need to do it Euros -- i'm
outside the US anyway ...)
Me too, inverse too, but ca is near US ;)
. i fully agree that activeSync support would be a fantastic addition
to sogo.
:)
as far as architecture goes, would a mysql backend scale better than *dav?
Perhaps, but this means that you will have to recode all business logic
and access control once more (Just as it is for the current funambol
connector)
André
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
