Hello Am 21.07.2016 um 15:37 schrieb Daniel Bareiro (daniel-lis...@gmx.net): > >>> I only see the SOGo packages mentioned in my previous email using the >>> official repositories of Debian. I'm not sure why the Debian maintainers >>> did not include the activesync package or if they included the >>> activesync support in some other package. > >> In Debian is an outdated version of SOGo, which didn't include >> ActiveSync support at all. >> Because of that you do not get sogo-activesync from Debian Jessie. > > It is a good point :-) Thanks for the clarification. Just for curiosity, > do you remember from what version of SOGo was added the ActiveSync support? > > I was researching [1] and the SOGo version in the unstable branch of > Debian repositories is the 2.2.17. > > In any case, it is always the option to generate the packets using the > procedure mentioned by Achim, or use the Nightly repositories of Inverse. > > Thanks for your reply. > > Kind regards, > Daniel > > [1] > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=sogo&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all >
2.2.17 has ActiveSync support already. But I would not set up a new SOGo server with that old version, because ActiveSync support has improved a lot since 2.2.17. There were cases, when synchronization didn't work at all, especially with big postboxes and calendars. Kind regards, Christian Mack -- Christian Mack Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung Basisdienste 78457 Konstanz +49 7531 88-4416
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
