On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:

> On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:24 PM, John Andersen wrote:
> >
> > Direct deliver is not evil, and the current fad of blocking DHCP 
> > assigned IPs had not cut down on spam one little bit.
> 
> It actually blocks a ton of spam in my world.

...which brings up something I have noticed in discussions about spam:

How many people consider "cut down on spam" or "reduce spam" from the
POV of spam sent vs. the POV of spam received?

In other words, Mr. Anderson seems to be saying "hasn't reduced the
amount being sent", and Mr. Rudd is saying "has reduced the amount
being delivered to my inbox".

Reducing the amount of spam delivered to the user's inbox is good for
the user, and is what SA is good at. Reducing the amount of spam
actually sent in the first place is good for the entire network
community, and a more important long-term goal because it reduces the
overall load on the network infrastructure; but it is something that
SA and DNSBLs and greylisting and such are NOT (directly at least)
achieving.

In fact, SA and related tools may be having a detrimental effect
overall because they cause the spammers to send that much *more* spam
in an attempt to bypass the filters and TMPFAILs and so forth.

Reducing volume of spam *sent* probably requires fundamental redesign
of the protocols, or some other major change in the cost/benefit
analysis.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]    FALaholic #11174    pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Look at the people at the top of both efforts. Linus Torvalds is a
 university graduate with a CS degree. Bill Gates is a university
 dropout who bragged about dumpster-diving and using other peoples'
 garbage code as the basis for his code. Maybe that has something to
 do with the difference in quality/security between Linux and
 Windows.                            -- anytwofiveelevenis on Y! SCOX
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to