Between the truly clueless administrator, and those that feign ignorance
to cover up their implicit approval of spammers...
What do you do in the case where someone is filtering deliveries to
their "abuse" mailbox? (Like 99% of mail sent there isn't going to
score positively...)
Sigh.
========
Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost)
by mail.redfish-solutions.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) id lA5HEMTM017203;
Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:14:22 -0700
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:14:22 -0700
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary="lA5HEMTM017203.1194282862/mail.redfish-solutions.com"
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
--lA5HEMTM017203.1194282862/mail.redfish-solutions.com
The original message was received at Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:14:14 -0700
from pool-71-112-36-94.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.112.36.94]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(reason: 550 Rejecting message scored for more than 8.0 (9.0) SPAM points.)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to arminco.com.:
DATA
<<< 550 Rejecting message scored for more than 8.0 (9.0) SPAM points.
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
--lA5HEMTM017203.1194282862/mail.redfish-solutions.com
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.redfish-solutions.com
Received-From-MTA: DNS; pool-71-112-36-94.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net
Arrival-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:14:14 -0700
Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.2.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; arminco.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Rejecting message scored for more than 8.0 (9.0)
SPAM points.
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:14:22 -0700
--lA5HEMTM017203.1194282862/mail.redfish-solutions.com
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [192.168.10.148] (pool-71-112-36-94.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net
[71.112.36.94])
(authenticated bits=0)
by mail.redfish-solutions.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id
lA5HECTN017198
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:14:14 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:14:05 -0800
From: Abuse Department <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Filtering abuse reports
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 192.168.1.3
Of course submitted mail to the Abuse mailbox is going to score as
"spam". It is spam. Why else would anyone be reporting it?
Please get a clue and turn off filtering on your abuse mailbox:
The original message was received at Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:10:58 -0700
from pool-71-112-36-94.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.112.36.94]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(reason: 550 Rejecting message scored for more than 8.0 (20.6) SPAM points.)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to styx.aic.net.:
>>> DATA
<<< 550 Rejecting message scored for more than 8.0 (15.1) SPAM points.
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
... while talking to arminco.com.:
>>> DATA
<<< 550 Rejecting message scored for more than 8.0 (20.6) SPAM points.
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
--lA5HEMTM017203.1194282862/mail.redfish-solutions.com--
