Hello Luis,
> -----Original Message----- > Ok, here is my doubt. I know who are Pyzor and DCC, and I really > convinced > that a statistic test is a must to detect spam. But my doubt is next: > - It is good to have both tests or just one? It is good to have both tests. Pyzor and DCC are both rather good at what they do. > I was thinking, lets have a mail that it is not a SPAM, and a SA with a > spam > level of 5. If > Pyzor reports 2.6 and DCC 2.7 then it is 5.3 and that good mail will be > spam. > I'm not really sure about if having both test will be good or just one. If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are very high that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000 incoming delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false positive from Pyzor or DCC yet, and have been using both for some years. IMHO there is nothing wrong with using both. If you do see FP's it would be a surprise, and the first I've heard of it, personally. Cheers, Michael Hutchinson
