Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 20:42:52, Michael Hutchinson a écrit : > Hello Luis, > > > -----Original Message----- > > Ok, here is my doubt. I know who are Pyzor and DCC, and I really > > convinced > > that a statistic test is a must to detect spam. But my doubt is next: > > - It is good to have both tests or just one? > > It is good to have both tests. Pyzor and DCC are both rather good at > what they do. > > > I was thinking, lets have a mail that it is not a SPAM, and a SA with > > a > > > spam > > level of 5. If > > Pyzor reports 2.6 and DCC 2.7 then it is 5.3 and that good mail will > > be > > > spam. > > I'm not really sure about if having both test will be good or just > > one. > > If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are very > high that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000 incoming > delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false positive from Pyzor > or DCC yet, and have been using both for some years. > > IMHO there is nothing wrong with using both. If you do see FP's it would > be a surprise, and the first I've heard of it, personally. > > Cheers, > Michael Hutchinson
Thanx,
