From: <rich...@buzzhost.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, 2009/December/04 06:04
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 06:55 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 3-Dec-2009, at 23:06, R-Elists wrote:
> certainly we understand your point here, yet what about accountability
> for
> Return Path Inc (and other RPI companies) related rules in the default
> Spamassassin configs?
My position on HABEAS is well-know by anyone who cares (I score it +0.5
and +2.0); that's not what I'm talking about: it's the constant whinging
by richard and falk at each other. Obviously they WANT to be
communicating since otherwise they could easily ignore/killfile each
other. I'm just tired of them doing it on this mailinglist.
Your idea of 'constant' amuses me and is stretching the truth
exponentially.
I'm curious why a commercial whitelist from a bulk mailing company has
such a positive inroad in Spamassassin. It's a fair question. I'm not
interested in your personal views of me, my question or my posting. You
have a killfile? You able to ignore on subject? Skills you may find
useful to learn yes?
Have you two gentlemen reported these spammers to ReturnPath, Lukreme's
long unused address might be a good source for scrubbing the ReturhPath
lists. (So far I've not seen one either way here.) I presume you two
gentlemen are telling me that you never see HABEAS on ham, right?
{^_^}
