>>>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Randy Ramsdell wrote: >>>>> The original email did not hit the NO_RELAYS rule but subsequent >>>>> runs through do hit this rule and it isn't on all email.
>> On 17.06.10 12:13, Randy Ramsdell wrote: >>> Hmmm, this mail came in and went straight to the users inbox. 1. >>> Postfix ---> 2. Amavis ( Spamd/Clamd) ---> 3. Postfix ---> 4. >>> Dovecot-deliver > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> in this case, this problem belongs more to amavis mailing list, not to >> spamassassin one. On 18.06.10 11:45, Randy Ramsdell wrote: > I have no problem going over there but I am not convinced that the > Amavis program is the problem. The header field is changed by > spamassassin. No, the format of headers showed that they were added by amavis, not spamassassin. While amavis uses spamassassin functions, it creates different headers. > Doesn't the email simply get handed to Spamassasin by > Amavis where the headers are modified by spam report etc...? usuallly not. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. WinError #99999: Out of error messages.
