On 9/2/2010 3:08 AM, Chris Datfung wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.org
<mailto:m...@junc.org>> wrote:
On ons 01 sep 2010 22:47:36 CEST, Chris Datfung wrote
header IN_NJABL_ORG
rbleval:check_rbl('njabl','dnsbl.njabl.org.')
describe IN_NJABL_ORG Received via a relay in dnsbl.njabl.org
<http://dnsbl.njabl.org>
tflags IN_NJABL_ORG net
score IN_NJABL_ORG 5
first errpr is you added it to a pre file, next is that it is in
std rules being checked
did you or debian run sa-update ?
Hi Benny,
I ran sa-update. As you pointed out, there are a number of RBLs in the
standard configuration that for some reason aren't checked, thus I
thought I could easily fix that by adding them to local.cf
<http://local.cf> and when that didn't work I tried in init.pre. I do
see other RBL generated scores in the message headers, so it appears
that some RBL checks are indeed performed.
what gives spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint | less
<snip>
Do you see any obvious problems?
Hmm, --lint isn't really the best option for a DNS problem. --lint
implies local-only mode, which limits its usefulness for this particular
kind of issue.
I can see you do have Net::DNS installed, which is good:
Sep 2 16:56:51.709 [986] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
Sep 2 16:56:51.709 [986] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.63
and I don't see any parse errors, which is also good..
Sep 2 16:56:53.771 [986] dbg: dns: is DNS available? 0
Sep 2 16:56:53.771 [986] dbg: rules: local tests only, ignoring RBL eval
But local-only mode is enforced, cutting our investigation short.
Can you try again using a message, such as the sample-spam.txt that
comes with the SA tarball.
spamassassin < sample-spam.txt 2>&1 -D
In particular, we want to look at the "dbg: dns: is DNS available?" line
and other DNS related ones nearby.
Thanks!
Chris
