Ted was remarkably impolite the way he phrased it. BUT, I will say as a
practical matter microprint emails do get rather short shrift from me when
scanning through message threads. I seldom dig in here of late. But I do scan
through the messages which look interesting and sometimes offer such advice as I
can. (Usually on topics a simple Google search doesn't help with.) I'm sure my
advice would be equivalent to much other advice you might get from people whose
eyes are better than mine. And mine are far better than most of my
contemporaries and some of my former co-workers at the time. But, on the very
small chance that advice from me or someone with worse vision than even me might
help, it might be a good idea to send emails that are more readable.
I am sure I am not the only person here who would appreciate it.
Thanks
{^_^}
On 2014-12-05 07:38, Noel Butler wrote:
pffft
I see no problem, as like most developers if you cant reproduce it, then its
nothing to bother about, after all this time 2 ppl dont like a font or whatever,
your pissing up the wrong tree if you think I have a care factor about changing
things when i cant reproduce it. time to move along ...
On 05/12/2014 19:46, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
The problem is Roundcube. It does not insert soft line breaks
as per the MIME Quoted-Printable encoding. There's a lot of
MIME stuff that Roundcube doesn't do very well, it's just not a very good web
mail interface. I'm always surprised at how vehemently
people defend it.
