Hm, it renders much more readable. I normally default reading to about 12 to 14
point fonts. The 10 point was getting down to a size that some letters were
becoming ambiguous, which seriously slows down reading.
Thanks for trying.
As a side note I see that the plain text of mine you quoted is rendered as about
14. That's a not unusual mutation for MUAs it seems. There is no font size
declaration so it may be a result of some of the things I did to T'bird trying
to see if I could tame stuff. The humor this look revealed is that yuor messages
is "font-size: x-large;". And about 12pt is what T'bird classifies as x-large it
appears. Most humorous.
I hope you have a good one.
{^_^}
On 2014-12-05 19:04, Noel Butler wrote:
Ted is always impolite, but he's right that the current roundcube editor
is shocking, in many ways (but not teh way mentioned here) and a few
people have brought this up, I understand my gripes are fixed, I'll soon
know in a week or two. It is rare that I post in here anyway, I've
posted more in past couple days than most of the last 10 years combined
:)
BTW RC now tells me this is 12pt, yet looks no bigger than before.
On 06/12/2014 06:29, jdow wrote:
Ted was remarkably impolite the way he phrased it. BUT, I will say as a
practical matter microprint emails do get rather short shrift from me when
scanning through message threads. I seldom dig in here of late. But I do scan
through the messages which look interesting and sometimes offer such advice as
I can. (Usually on topics a simple Google search doesn't help with.) I'm sure
my advice would be equivalent to much other advice you might get from people
whose eyes are better than mine. And mine are far better than most of my
contemporaries and some of my former co-workers at the time. But, on the very
small chance that advice from me or someone with worse vision than even me
might help, it might be a good idea to send emails that are more readable.
I am sure I am not the only person here who would appreciate it.
Thanks
{^_^}
On 2014-12-05 07:38, Noel Butler wrote:
pffft I see no problem, as like most developers if you cant reproduce it, then
its nothing to bother about, after all this time 2 ppl dont like a font or
whatever, your pissing up the wrong tree if you think I have a care factor
about changing things when i cant reproduce it. time to move along ... On
05/12/2014 19:46, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: The problem is Roundcube. It does not
insert soft line breaks as per the MIME Quoted-Printable encoding. There's a
lot of MIME stuff that Roundcube doesn't do very well, it's just not a very
good web mail interface. I'm always surprised at how vehemently people defend
it.
