But it's not smart to choose something that we all know is going to die,
right or not?


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Boris Horvat <horvat.z.bo...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Emmanuel FOCUS. Relax. 1, 2, 3, Again relax. Breath slowly now. 1, 2, 3.
>
> You calm? Ok good. Now listen.
>
> People have the right to choice what they want. Tapestry is a tool just a
> tool, you can pick another one if you dont like it. People have different
> needs, expectations, desires and they chose tapestry you dont and that is
> fine
>
> 1, 2, 3. Relax.... and enjoy your perfect world without tapestry.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Emmanuel Sowah <eso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Well, there are too few ( 20 or so?) Tapestry users to warrant a Facebook
> > page. So I think this is the best place to enlighten people.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Jens Breitenstein <
> mailingl...@j-b-s.de
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Emmanuel,
> > >
> > > please stop your spam. This is a mailing list for developers even
> stupid
> > > ones like us using tapestry.
> > > Create your little Facebook page name it "Tapestry sucks" add a "I
> > dislike
> > > it too" button or something else and we all can continue with more
> > serious
> > > stuff.
> > >
> > > Jens
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 20.11.13 22:12, schrieb Emmanuel Sowah:
> > >
> > >  Alexander,
> > >>
> > >> I'm sorry to disappoint you, but Tapestry cannot be revived. Tapestry
> > has
> > >> been in coma for too long. As you may know, people who have been in
> coma
> > >> for a very long time cannot be revived. They ultimately die, as
> Tapestry
> > >> is
> > >> slowly dying now. Check the article found at
> > >> http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-
> > >> makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/.
> > >> Choose one of those frameworks mentioned there and you'll be fine.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Alexander Sommer <
> > >> alexander.som...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  tapestry would and will easily revive if 5.4. would come out with
> full
> > >>> jQuery (and jQuery mobile) support ;-)
> > >>>
> > >>> I am just waiting for 5.4 and think that others are doing the same.
> > >>>
> > >>> I also would love mobile web templates with 5.4 based on jQuery
> mobile.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> 2013/11/20 Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us>
> > >>>
> > >>>  What a troll!!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:52 PM, Emmanuel Sowah wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  Guys,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> You Tapestry aficionados are just some radicals who are blind to
> see
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> the
> > >>>
> > >>>> reality. The fact of the matter is Tapestry is no more relevant in
> the
> > >>>>> developers community. Even Mr. Ship doesn't use Tapestry anymore in
> > his
> > >>>>> projects. Stop being stupid and look around for a better
> alternative.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> Your
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> knowledge and experience about Tapestry won't land you a job
> > anywhere.
> > >>>>> Tapestry is now only used on hobby projects at home. As we're
> > speaking
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> now,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Howard is happily coding Wicket on a client's project.Leave this
> cult
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> and
> > >>>
> > >>>> do something better with serious frameworks. Tapestry is dying an
> > >>>>> inevitable death.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Cheers
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Norman Franke <nor...@myasd.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> That's funny, I was thinking the same thing. Someone who doesn't
> know
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> any
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> better about how to write a modern web application and insists that
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> JSP
> > >>>
> > >>>> code is "closer to the bare metal" and thus better.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Norman Franke
> > >>>>>> Answering Service for Directors, Inc.
> > >>>>>> www.myasd.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Nov 18, 2013, at 7:09 PM, John <j...@quivinco.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>  Haha. Maybe it's someone who's maintaining thousands of lines of
> > evil
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> old incomprehensible JSP, has seen the promised land (Tapestry)
> and
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> feels
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> bad about it. (Like the guy who never gets invited to parties).
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>>>>>> From: Lance Java
> > >>>>>>> To: Tapestry users
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 9:38 PM
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Web frameworks
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I'm not sure why... but for some reason a random user comes on
> this
> > >>>>>>> tapestry list about once a year spreading FUD with a message
> > similar
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> to
> > >>>
> > >>>> this one. I've never really understood why... Please ignore this
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> thread.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 18 November 2013 19:12, Emmanuel Sowah <eso...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>  Hi guys,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> There is a great report that compares web frameworks and can be
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> found
> > >>>
> > >>>> here:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-
> > >>> makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/
> > >>>
> > >>>> To my surprise, Tapestry didn't make it to the list. This makes me
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> very
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> nervous to even consider Tapestry for our upcoming project. I'm
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> scared
> > >>>
> > >>>> Tapestry may be abandoned one day and leave us in the cold. It may
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> be
> > >>>
> > >>>> a
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> nice framework, but Tapestry's popularity is extremely low within
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>
> > >>>> developers' community. Why is that? Is it because of it's track
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> record
> > >>>
> > >>>> on
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> releases and backward compatibility issues, which I read a lot
> > about
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> on
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> google search? Or is it because it's a one man project?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> What do you think?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>> Emmanuel
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely
> *Boris Horvat*
>

Reply via email to