On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:52:09 -0200, Emmanuel Sowah <eso...@gmail.com>
wrote:
You Tapestry aficionados are just some radicals who are blind to see the
reality.
Says the guys who loved to post about Wicket in a Tapestry mailing list .
. . :D
Even Mr. Ship doesn't use Tapestry anymore in his projects.
[citation needed]
Stop being stupid and look around for a better alternative. Your
knowledge and experience about Tapestry won't land you a job anywhere.
Well, my current job I got exactly because of my Tapestry experience. And
I got some offers from other places.
Tapestry is now only used on hobby projects at home.
[citation needed]
Just for example, most respected English dictionary, Oxford English
Dictionary, have its online versions written in Tapestry:
http://oed.com. Just open the home page, see the sources and search for
Tapestry.
Right now I'm working on a Tapestry project.
As we're speaking now, Howard is happily coding Wicket on a client's
project.
[citation needed]
Hey, another Wicket mention! There's got to be a drinking game about it. :)
Leave this cult and
do something better with serious frameworks. Tapestry is dying an
inevitable death.
A library or framework dies when nobody is using it anymore. The traffic
in this mailing list alone is proof that are people using it, not to
mention the larger pool of people that use it but doesn't post in the
mailing lists.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
