On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Sean Dawson <seandawson2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In any case, people do it - and it was working before. Uh, "people do" lots of objectively wrong things in web development, and "works in some circumstances" ≠ "adheres to the spec" :-) My reading of the RFC (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#page-21) is that there's no reason to expect a response-body from a PUT, even if the mention of returning either 200 or 204 is a bit ambiguous. So it wouldn't surprise me to see a server implementation discard a response-body from a PUT as invalid. FWIW, -- Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroe...@gmail.com http://about.me/hassanschroeder twitter: @hassan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
