"Mark Thomas" <ma...@apache.org> wrote in message news:4987ccc4.3080...@apache.org... > > The (very) short version is: > mod_proxy_ajp is not as stable as mod_jk. > > mod_jk and mod_proxy_http are prety much neck and neck. mod_proxy_http has > a > very slight edge on average but on a case by case basis either may be the > better > choice.
Is there any documentation / howtos available for securely setting up mod_proxy_http and/or mod_proxy_ajp with tomcat? The little that I know/remember about mod_proxy_http is that if you're not careful, you can end up with some major security holes in your installation. I did a quick cursory search and found enormous references to setting up mod_jk; there doesn't seem to be as much ref material for either mod_proxy_http or mod_proxy_ajp. However, all this begs the question - what is the difference between mod_jk which communicates via AJP and mod_proxy_ajp? Doesn't mod_proxy_ajp just communicate via the AJP protocol as well? In which case, isn't that tantamount to having the same issues/considerations as the AJP protocol in the first place? Thanks, Eric --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
