-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark,
Mark Thomas wrote: > The (very) short version is: > mod_proxy_ajp is not as stable as mod_jk. I'm a longtime user of mod_jk and, having had the unfortunate experience of trying to migrate from mod_jk to mod_proxy_ajp, I can say that mod_proxy_ajp is either not able to be configured in such complex ways, or the configuration is different enough as to be unintelligible by a seasoned mod_jk user. I suspect that use of mod_proxy_http is likely to give you the same problems with a complex configuration. Specifically, I need to map some URI patterns to one Tomcat instance, while mapping other URIs within the same URI space (like /foo/bar/bas.do to one Tomcat and then /foo/*.do to some other one), and I was unable to get this working with mod_proxy_ajp. Since the configuration for mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_http are virtually the same (except for the use of the ajp:// protocol), I suspect the same thing to be true for mod_proxy_http. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmLbk8ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCvxQCZAVxuL4EngfoRoiUHxwUkI3yX AiwAn3UymHzguxdRxyB6yk68E687Z7kY =fxmx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
