Hi Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev now
Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hey all, > > First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support! > > It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status. > > So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that > should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but > for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1 tests. > > John > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> To: Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> >> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; David Blevins < >> [email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't >> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use >> tomee-remote with plus classifier configured): >> >> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId> >> <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId> >> <version>0.2-incubating</version> >> </dependency> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId> >> <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId> >> <version>0.1-incubating</version> >> </dependency> >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: >> > great, thks >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Romain Manni-Bucau >> > @rmannibucau >> > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> > https://github.com/rmannibucau >> > >> > >> > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>: >> >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to >> delete >> >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the >> same >> >> url: >> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> >> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>; " [email protected] >> " >> >> <[email protected]> >> >> Cc: David Blevins <[email protected]> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> >> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Roberto Cortez >> >> <[email protected]> >> >> Cc: David Blevins <[email protected]> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >> >> >> Hello Roberto, >> >> >> >> is it broken again? I get 404 >> >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> @rmannibucau >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <[email protected] >> >: >> >>> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the >> >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> >> >>> Roberto >> >>> >> >>> From: Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> >> >>> To: David Blevins <[email protected]>; "[email protected] " >> >>> <[email protected]> >> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM >> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >>> >> >>> Hi David, >> >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :) >> >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using >> the >> >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They >> are >> >>> looking into it. >> >>> Cheers,Roberto >> >>> From: David Blevins <[email protected]> >> >>> To: [email protected]; Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> >> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM >> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >>> >> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) >> >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to >> track >> >>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the >> Apache side >> >>> if needed. >> >>> >> >>> -David >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi guys, >> >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. >> >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: >> >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added >> profiles >> >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / >> tests >> >>> we got the following results: >> >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are >> >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few >> tests. >> >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI >> >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - >> Missing >> >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic >> - No >> >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. >> Related >> >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test >> >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - >> OKjta - >> >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - >> Failing a >> >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test >> Failureswebsocket - >> >>> OK >> >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail >> >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. >> >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also >> missing >> >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI >> environment, >> >>> but it will be there. >> >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) >> >>> Cheers,Roberto >> >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> >>> To: [email protected] >> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM >> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >> >>> >> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >>>> >> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html >> >>>> >> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE >> 7.0. >> >>>> >> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the >> >>>> tomee >> >>>> zip). >> >>>> This decision would speedup the release. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it >> >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to >> stay >> >>> apache. >> >>> >> >>> Well stay openjpa i think. >> >>> >> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had >> the >> >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> View this message in context: >> >>> >> >>> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html >> >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau
