pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these particular tests but hopefully it will
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-06 9:52 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>: > Hi, > Thank you John! > I just added the dependencies for batch as well in > https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so > that took care of a few missing tests. > Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, > since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional. > Cheers,Roberto > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM > Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 > > Hi > Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev > now > > Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament <[email protected]> a écrit : >> Hey all, >> >> First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support! >> >> It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status. >> >> So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that >> should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but >> for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1 > tests. >> >> John >> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez > <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >>> To: Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> >>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; David Blevins < >>> [email protected]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >>> >>> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't >>> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use >>> tomee-remote with plus classifier configured): >>> >>> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId> >>> <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId> >>> <version>0.2-incubating</version> >>> </dependency> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId> >>> <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId> >>> <version>0.1-incubating</version> >>> </dependency> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau >>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: >>> > great, thks >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Romain Manni-Bucau >>> > @rmannibucau >>> > http://www.tomitribe.com >>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> > >>> > >>> > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>: >>> >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to >>> delete >>> >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the >>> same >>> >> url: >>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ >>> >> >>> >> ________________________________ >>> >> From: Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> >>> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>; " > [email protected] >>> " >>> >> <[email protected]> >>> >> Cc: David Blevins <[email protected]> >>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM >>> >> >>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >>> >> >>> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Roberto Cortez >>> >> <[email protected]> >>> >> Cc: David Blevins <[email protected]> >>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM >>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >>> >> >>> >> Hello Roberto, >>> >> >>> >> is it broken again? I get 404 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> >> @rmannibucau >>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com >>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <[email protected] >>> >: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the >>> >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>> >>> Roberto >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> >>> >>> To: David Blevins <[email protected]>; "[email protected] > " >>> >>> <[email protected]> >>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM >>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :) >>> >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using >>> the >>> >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They >>> are >>> >>> looking into it. >>> >>> Cheers,Roberto >>> >>> From: David Blevins <[email protected]> >>> >>> To: [email protected]; Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> >>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM >>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >>> >>> >>> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) >>> >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to >>> track >>> >>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the >>> Apache side >>> >>> if needed. >>> >>> >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. >>> >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: >>> >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added >>> profiles >>> >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / >>> tests >>> >>> we got the following results: >>> >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are >>> >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few >>> tests. >>> >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI >>> >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - >>> Missing >>> >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic >>> - No >>> >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. >>> Related >>> >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test >>> >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - >>> OKjta - >>> >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - >>> Failing a >>> >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test >>> Failureswebsocket - >>> >>> OK >>> >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more > detail >>> >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. >>> >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also >>> missing >>> >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI >>> environment, >>> >>> but it will be there. >>> >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) >>> >>> Cheers,Roberto >>> >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM >>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <[email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>>> >>> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html >>> >>>> >>> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE >>> 7.0. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the >>> >>>> tomee >>> >>>> zip). >>> >>>> This decision would speedup the release. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since > it >>> >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to >>> stay >>> >>> apache. >>> >>> >>> >>> Well stay openjpa i think. >>> >>> >>> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had >>> the >>> >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> View this message in context: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html >>> >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > >
