Could you elaborate on what is lacking in Wicket when referring to the back 
button support (when compared to GWT)? I was under the impression that Wicket 
had robust back button support?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Is Wicket a proper framework for a Webshop ?


It sounds to me like GWT might be a better choice, especially if you
need Ajax & robust back button support. Wicket is a good choice when
you need a mixed approach.

I don't think SpringMVC would be a better choice in any way.

Eelco

On 8/28/07, neekibo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all Wicket-users!
>
> I am new to web development and so to Wicket. I'm searching for a/the
> suitable framework for my case.
>
> So here a few constrains:
>  - A webshop with lots of products and categories
>  - Integration with SpringCore and Hibernate
>  - Ajax-Magic for a fast responding UI and Drag'n'Drop
>
> And a few misgivings:
>  1.) A component framework is overhead for a webshop (mostly simple
> db-read-access operations without a state). A request/response-driven
> framework fits better in this context.
>  2.) I need standard back and forth browser behaviour. Is this easy to
> achieve (with ajax in mind) ?
>  3.) Security: I need to easy code "sign in" and secure the payment process
> (ssl over http is guess)
>  4.) Performance/Scalability. I know, in general the DB is the bottleneck
> but ... compared to action-based frameworks. I read somewhere that Wicket is
> much faster that JSF, so this seems good to me.
>
> So these are just a few thoughts, I'm a new to this topic, so pardon me if
> something is wrong. In the moment my alternative is SpringMVC. But the
> concepts of Wicket appeals to me. Especially the complete lack of JSPs.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Paul
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Is-Wicket-a-proper-framework-for-a-Webshop---tf4341788.html#a12368098
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to