On Jan 14, 2008 6:08 AM, Alex Jacoby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've hit exactly this type of issue -- you try to override one of the > public methods, and it turns out that the object isn't fully > initialized yet, so you can't do what you'd hoped to.
do you have the example so we can do something to improve this? > It's a matter of balance -- overall I think the documentation is > pretty good, but there are places where it's weaker than it should > be. Yes, I can set breakpoints and step through the code, but that > shouldn't be the default response to questions about missing > documentation. Following that argument you could say that NO javadocs > are ever necessary :) ha. browse the archives or lurk on this list for a while, you will see that this is an extremely seldom response from the wicket team. -igor > > Thanks for all the great work, > Alex > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
